SSD - solid state-drev rangering

Diagram, der sammenligner ydeevnen for de bedste Solid State-drev. Seneste samsung, corsair, adata, wd, sandisk, afgørende, intel SSD-hastighed sammenlignet i en ranking. Find ud af, hvilken SSD der er hurtigst i verden.

2022-11-08
Solid State Drives Ranking
Relativ ydeevne
-
Mere er bedre
Læs
Skrive
sus write
4k mixed
Tjek pris
.
.
.
.
.
WD Black SN850 NVMe 2TB
100%
.
.
.
.
.
3530
3789
3016
91.1
.
.
.
.
.
WD Black SN850 NVMe 1TB
92%
.
.
.
.
.
3297
3656
2324
94
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB
85%
.
.
.
.
.
2569
2893
2613
98.6
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 1TB
82%
.
.
.
.
.
2615
2882
2159
100
.
.
.
.
.
WD Black SN850 NVMe 500GB
82%
.
.
.
.
.
3082
3318
1473
96.8
.
.
.
.
.
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe 2TB
74%
.
.
.
.
.
1941
3039
2318
78
.
.
.
.
.
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe 2TB
74%
.
.
.
.
.
1918
2997
2377
75.7
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 500GB
73%
.
.
.
.
.
2596
2641
1442
96
.
.
.
.
.
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe 1TB
72%
.
.
.
.
.
1965
3054
1945
79.5
.
.
.
.
.
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe 2TB
71%
.
.
.
.
.
1883
2970
2102
75.2
.
.
.
.
.
Intel 670p NVMe 2TB
70%
.
.
.
.
.
2454
1953
1681
95.3
.
.
.
.
.
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe 1TB
69%
.
.
.
.
.
1921
3031
1709
77.7
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe 2TB
68%
.
.
.
.
.
2317
2122
1741
85.5
.
.
.
.
.
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe 1TB
67%
.
.
.
.
.
1916
2969
1636
76.9
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe 1TB
67%
.
.
.
.
.
2365
2148
1492
90
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe 500GB
61%
.
.
.
.
.
2406
2147
870
86.2
.
.
.
.
.
HP EX950 NVMe 2TB
60%
.
.
.
.
.
2293
1794
1326
79.4
.
.
.
.
.
HP EX950 NVMe 1TB
57%
.
.
.
.
.
2231
1700
1166
76.2
.
.
.
.
.
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe 500GB
57%
.
.
.
.
.
1929
2125
1072
74.7
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P5 3D NVMe 2TB
56%
.
.
.
.
.
1938
1707
1767
62.3
.
.
.
.
.
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe 1TB
56%
.
.
.
.
.
2304
1652
1029
75.7
.
.
.
.
.
Intel 670p NVMe 1TB
56%
.
.
.
.
.
2218
1681
1061
75.7
.
.
.
.
.
WD Black SN750 NVMe 1TB (2019)
56%
.
.
.
.
.
1857
2023
1288
69.2
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P5 3D NVMe 1TB
56%
.
.
.
.
.
2023
1800
1499
62.9
.
.
.
.
.
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe 2TB
54%
.
.
.
.
.
2106
1606
1191
70.3
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 980 NVMe 1TB
54%
.
.
.
.
.
1556
1887
1228
75.8
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P5 3D NVMe 500GB
52%
.
.
.
.
.
2006
1846
1103
63.1
.
.
.
.
.
HP EX950 NVMe 512GB
52%
.
.
.
.
.
2245
1469
732
78.3
.
.
.
.
.
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe 2TB
51%
.
.
.
.
.
1382
2014
1460
60.2
.
.
.
.
.
WD Black SN750 NVMe 2TB (2019)
51%
.
.
.
.
.
1732
1932
1353
55.7
.
.
.
.
.
WD Black SN750 NVMe 500GB (2019)
51%
.
.
.
.
.
1832
1947
797
68.6
.
.
.
.
.
Sabrent Rocket NVMe 4TB
51%
.
.
.
.
.
1284
2035
1288
65
.
.
.
.
.
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe 512GB
50%
.
.
.
.
.
2265
1494
574
74.2
.
.
.
.
.
Corsair Force NVMe 2TB
48%
.
.
.
.
.
1324
2038
1061
62.2
.
.
.
.
.
Corsair Force NVMe 960GB
48%
.
.
.
.
.
1263
2040
962
65.8
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 980 NVMe 500GB
47%
.
.
.
.
.
1442
1737
768
72.7
.
.
.
.
.
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe 1TB
47%
.
.
.
.
.
1205
1959
1119
60.9
.
.
.
.
.
WD Blue SN550 NVMe 1TB
46%
.
.
.
.
.
1471
1653
725
70.6
.
.
.
.
.
Sabrent Rocket NVMe 1TB
46%
.
.
.
.
.
1196
1860
1043
62
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P2 3D NVMe 2TB
45%
.
.
.
.
.
1032
1639
1079
67.3
.
.
.
.
.
Intel 660p NVMe 2TB
44%
.
.
.
.
.
1426
1394
787
70.7
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P1 3D NVMe 1TB
44%
.
.
.
.
.
1486
1270
709
71.8
.
.
.
.
.
WD Blue SN550 NVMe 500GB
42%
.
.
.
.
.
1472
1514
399
70.5
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P2 3D NVMe 1TB
42%
.
.
.
.
.
1018
1528
952
64.1
.
.
.
.
.
Corsair Force NVMe 480GB
41%
.
.
.
.
.
1235
1670
593
63.4
.
.
.
.
.
Intel 660p NVMe 1TB
41%
.
.
.
.
.
1382
1364
528
68.5
.
.
.
.
.
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe 1TB
40%
.
.
.
.
.
1760
1042
846
49.3
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P2 3D NVMe 500GB
39%
.
.
.
.
.
1005
1313
827
60.9
.
.
.
.
.
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe 512GB
38%
.
.
.
.
.
1731
1034
732
47.4
.
.
.
.
.
WD Blue SN500 NVMe 500GB
37%
.
.
.
.
.
1113
1121
588
63
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial P1 3D NVMe 500GB
36%
.
.
.
.
.
1408
835
446
65.3
.
.
.
.
.
HP EX900 NVMe 1TB
32%
.
.
.
.
.
1376
1151
778
31.5
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB
24%
.
.
.
.
.
473
444
440
53.9
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB
23%
.
.
.
.
.
469
435
426
51.5
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial MX500 2TB
22%
.
.
.
.
.
443
420
421
48.6
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB
22%
.
.
.
.
.
477
424
387
48
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial MX500 500GB
22%
.
.
.
.
.
451
425
400
47.2
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB
21%
.
.
.
.
.
460
410
356
47.8
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB
21%
.
.
.
.
.
472
402
356
46.2
.
.
.
.
.
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB
20%
.
.
.
.
.
459
372
299
43.7
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial BX500 960GB
13%
.
.
.
.
.
479
368
130
22.9
.
.
.
.
.
Crucial BX500 480GB
11%
.
.
.
.
.
464
380
198
13.5
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%

Diagram, der sammenligner ydeevnen for de bedste solid state-drev. Seneste SSD'er sammenlignet i en ranking. Find ud af, hvilket solid state-drev der er hurtigst i verden. Liste, der sammenligner den seneste solid state drive ydeevne fra alle mærker: samsung, corsair, adata, wd, sandisk, crucial, intel. Hastighed for seneste (m2) m.2 vs sata SSD benchmarks. Find ud af hvilken ssd der er den bedste. Hvilken type solid state-drev fra hvilket mærke er verdens hurtigst. Hvilken model i denne sammenligning er mest kraftfuld og god nok til at være i top 10 SSD'er. Find ud af, hvilken der er bedst ud af alle drev til pc og bærbar computer.
About article
show less
artimg
logo width=
Techrankup